http://www.thatvideosite.com/video/1835

Read this and you'll understand why I say educational standards need tightened up.

Until an amendment is made for the second amendment, it's still part of our bill of rights. What bother's me is the whole 'it's just a piece of paper bit' if it is indeed true. The fact that it sounds like it -could- happen is frightening in of itself.

I second the killing of that damned buzzing ad. Same with the talking smiley face. Friggen annoying pricks.

only thing i have to say about this is that i'm not going to take a site seriously that has v for vendetta in their logo. just like when people link to www.bobs911site.com as "evidence" of anything. if you want to be taken seriously, show it in a manor that i could cite in a report.

I think that it is funny that the end of the article tries to convince the reader that the writer is outside the bounds of human bias. The writer tries to say that all articles written on Sign of the Times are purely an analysis of the facts and not any kind of "wishful thinking" on the part of the author. I think he fails to realize that his article is merely his interpretation of the facts, therefore are bias with his own "wishful thinking" of how and why the facts are as they are. I think this is especially true in politics seeing as it is impossible to see things as they really are. There are too many people doing things to fulfill theirs and other people's agendas to really know why certain things are done. The lack of gun control could just be the result of the fact that one of the biggest lobbies in the US is pushing to try to prevent it, and the fact that (despite what some pro gun control people think) it is a constitutional right to bear arms. Also, how does the author expect the public to change the current administration using firearms? I used to think that someone should execute Bush, but then I realized (like others have on ShoutWire) that his assassination would merely be used as a pretext to take more rights away from the people (an opinion, I admit). I think anyone smart enough to pull off an assassination would be smart enough to realize this (of course that doesn't necessarily include people that have enough dumb luck to pull it off). If a person could easily shape the government using guns, don't you think there would be a lot more violence against politicians? Besides, this is just one administration and it won't be in power for ever (it is, in fact, comprised of people who aren't Highlanders). If anyone hasn't figured it out, I am a gun nut and I love guns. But I don't buy them for security, I buy then because I am interested in them and having them provides me with a hobby.