no one is debating that dmitch86... the point is that the Government weather it was bush, clinton, bush, or regan lost $2.3 Trillion dollars...

that is more than some countries total foreign acct debt, and it is 1/250th of the USA's.... that is a shitload of money to just lose. and the worst part about it is that it is YOUR money....

so you just get in here give us your 2 cents and say that it wasn't Bush so forget about it..... Good call brother... Good call...

This story seems a bit flawed. Of course many expenses go unaccounted for, but 2.3 trillion?
This is probably another manipulation by the liberal media

Yes, thats right dumbasses, there are both conservative and liberal media. This looks to be highly slanted. Look at the credibilty of this document, its coming from a POLITICIAN'S website. And I don't know about you, but I seriously cannot trust and fucking politician no matter what side they're on. They're all equally douchbags.

Anyway its not like 2.3 trillion is missing, thats just how the media wants to interpret it. What Rummy probably ment was that 2.3 trillion can not be accounted for its direct purpose but know where the money went. He probably knows damn well where the fuck it went.

Remember people, don't take what you see in quotes on websites to be hard fact. Shit can be interpreted and misleading. Thats journalism these days.

LOL^ nice post man, I only used this site because it was the first one I came across, I mean this 2.3 trillion dollars is not a conspiracy it's fact. The only reason you lot haven't heard about it is because they DON'T WANT YOU TO. NO matter whether you believe 9 11 was an inside job or that it was what the GOvernment says, the fact that they used this disaster to cover and bury the news that this much money went missing is appalling, here are some more sites covering the news : http://theyardstick.blogspot.com/2005/08/23-trillion-dollars-missing.h
tml
http://digg.com/links/2.3_TRILLION_PENTAGON_$$_GO_MISSING_ON_9_10
_2001_9_11
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/620276/posts
http://
www.apfn.net/MESSAGEBOARD/07-07-04/discussion.cgi.24.html

and how about this being confirmed by the DOD here you go:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2002/n04032002_200204033.htm
l
http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20010910-secdef.html
htt
p://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2002/n02202002_200202201.html
http://
www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2001/s20010711-depsecdef2.html
http://ww
w.anxietyculture.com/bulletin030903.htm

THis has nothing to do with Bush, republicans or liberals or whatever, it is purely to do with the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT LOST 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS. That's it.

-Nikko

You seem to take most of your sources from one-sided websites and biased places, so I feel no need to defend my thoughts against your accusations. More "Open your eyes" mantra? It's humorous how your arguments seem to cover over the same ground.

That's American money, and you live in Australia. I don't look over your pocketbook, so don't look over mine. 150,000 people dead: According to numbers and statistics mostly put out by the early Iraqi government during the war; yeah, that's likely to be unbiased.

^^ an example of someone who says the government wants to keep everything quiet about the money, yet cites most of the money loss information from government web sites who openly acknowledges the losses.