I actually find CBC(the french one mind you) quite correct.

They're the best and most unbiased IMO, on most subjects anyways.

They're forced to speak about the rest of Canada and thus can show some pretty boring stories, but the others news channel speak about celebrities and the like instead, which is worst obviously.

And about the Ron Paul news blackout...I've heard about him on CBS when they talked about every candidates in both parties. Considering the very low popular support he got in polls, you can't expect to see documentaries about him. Considering it isn't our country, it's pretty normal they only spoke about the biggest contendors, Obama/Clinton for the Dems, and Mccain/Romney for the Rep.

Libertarians are a fringe group, it's normal they have a very minor, if inexistant media coverage. Do you see any media talking about the socialist parties of America? Or the Reform party? They should, a little. But they don't.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEVuQa1lV8w

Bulshoy '08

"Not speaking about every candidate isn't bias. Canada doesn't hear about RP like it doesn't hear about Kunnich or Gravel. They won't win, so they don't lose their time speaking about them."

I thought it was for the people who decides who wins?

Was there some memo I missed saying so and so isn't viable? Since the very beginning, it's been the mainstream media parroting the idea that he can not, in no way, win.

I think it was Han Solo who said it best 'Never tell me the odds'.

Even by your responses, you trumpet the same defeatest message provided by FOX news anchors who *subtly ingrain artificial and manipulative statements.

*subtly meaning that if one isn't looking for it, they wouldn't notice it, but since I'm mentioning it, I'll give you a quick example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=herUw6FX4MI

Look at the questions the FOX announcers ask him. They interject ridiculous assertions that attacks would be imminent if he was in power. Listen to the FOX announcers laugh during his answers and tell me that is honest, impartial journalism.

It's nothing more than a trick. It is illusionary. Not real. False. Fake.

"I hate America so I'm not voting. Shouted."

Not even for McCain?

"The people of the United States. Their will is scanned throught polls."

Bullshit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSYiUAaBd1U


Tell me that isn't coercion.

"It's simply unacceptable that America's medias don't speak about him. But here, it's Canada, not the US. 99% of Canadian listeners don't want to be bothered about each and every candidate in a foreign election. Hell, it's not even an election, it's primaries!"

I don't know anyone really interested in the US elections, yet we get daily stories about them.

I don't know if you understand what the hell I've been talking about, or if you're purposely going out of your way to try and ignore it, but that's exactly what you're doing.

"If you're a libertarian, you must expect defeat. This is an ideology, like no other, that benefit to a very very small fringe group of society. Anarchy for the rich. Even then, these rich people prefer to limit their profit and live with the rule of law and thus to guarentee their assets. Libertarianism is doomed to fail.

Don't get me wrong, I love Ron Paul isolationist message. But everything else in his program is pure craziness."

Your entire statement pretty much confirms that you don't understand, or are purposely being obtuse.

He is running as a Republican. He says that every time some journalist parrot shouts libertarian at him. Say something enough and people tend to accept it as fact when it's nothing more than a catch phrase. Whazzuuuuup. Islamo fascism, insurgent, pre-emptive,isolationist.

Nonsense.

You have a brain. Use it to think for yourself. Grab a thesaurus and stop using the cliches and bargain-basement slander.

Where do you get isolationist from?
We're in Canada. Before Afghanistan's fuckup, do you think Canadians were isolationists too? We didn't have troops everywhere aside from the people who serve with NATO. It would be a waste of time to be sending troops all over to sit on their thumbs.

Anarchy for the rich?
I don't even know how you get that idea. Considering the tax breaks and fringe perks big business already gets, I'd say they already dominate a market that's devoid of laws anyways.