BBC Conspiracy Files - More Than A Hit-piece, A Whitewash

54

Shouts

0

Bashes

BBC Conspiracy Files - More Than A Hit-piece, A Whitewash

Posted by 911eyewitness Promoted 1125 days 2 hours ago 472 views

Politics / US Politics | 11 comments |

Stumble it!

Omissions: no eyewitness reports of explosions. No FDNY testimonies. No quotes from anchors. No mention of FAA records being destroyed. No sustained shots of the WTC1 & 2 'collapses' showing explosive force . No mention of debris hurled 400 feet sideways. No molten metal. No Thermite. No Steven Jones. No David Ray Griffin. No mention of 4,000,000 views of Loose Change. No 85 confiscated videos at Pentagon. No Minetta testimony. No skeptic eyewitnesses at pentagon or Shanksville.

« View full article »

My Shout Count

Comments

These comments in RSS.

Comment View Threshold:

Encablossa, on 2/20/2007 4:07:19 AM
Total Posts: 130, Joined: 10/21/2006

I wasn't shown any evidence either, I guess all those people were paid actors. But here you are trying to convince me with some shitty BBC opinions that also lack evidence. Bottom line: You and the conspirators suck

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

WORMSS, on 2/20/2007 4:13:24 AM
Total Posts: 70, Joined: 12/5/2005

we have already sent mail to the BBC for there butt kissing when this was shown on TV..

there was more evidence showen in Lose Change than in the entire Funded production from the BBC..

everyone should just email/mail them calling them butt kissers and see what they do then!

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

EvaUnitZero, on 2/20/2007 6:07:45 AM
Total Posts: 2743, Joined: 2/8/2006

Don't worry, I doubt anyone watched it anyway. The 9/11 conspiracy theory's credibility is safe. At least it's in the same state as it was before this aired i.e. everyone still thinks you're paranoid, hate-filled nutjobs. No biggy.

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

NutManIV, on 2/20/2007 6:58:46 AM
Total Posts: 688, Joined: 10/18/2006

So how many 9/11 conspiracies are there now?

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

mongo, on 2/20/2007 7:28:40 AM
Total Posts: 60, Joined: 8/7/2006

http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/53864/9_11_The_Conspiracy_Files

Here it is. I watched it on Sunday and was very impressed with the fact they stuck to cold hard facts rather than 'eyewitness accounts' which any Judge or Police Officer will tell you are always subject to distortion (check out Loftus et al, 1975 "Subjects who recieve misleading post-event information after viewing an event are less accurate in reporting event details than subjects in a control condition")

This article looks at this documentry as if it was a one-off attack at 9/11 conspiracy theories (and that the government paid them to hide the 'real facts' or something) and completely ignores the cold hard evidence that refute plenty of the conspiracies and that it's part of a series which looks into other conspiracies as well (Diana, David Kelly, Oklahoma Bombing).

Okay so they didn't go into huge detail with everything, but you try producing a documentry which is trying to debunk every theory in the space of an hour.

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

aRCeeCollins, on 2/20/2007 10:04:58 AM
Total Posts: 17, Joined: 2/23/2006

Its true. All they did was focus on the moral side of it, after i watched it i kinda felt that they played to the offcial story believers at the end with the whole "why can't they just be quite and leave the victims of 9/11 alone? They want to get on with their lives?" Then the playing of the sad music as the documentary slowly faded out. Bollocks. That was a blatent guilt trip.

The documentary clearled some things up about the whole delta/flight 93 going down in cleavland thing, which was good to see, i think we can cross that off our list of suspicion.
But it didn't at all focus on the collapse of the towers or any of the scientific side of it. Which is exactly what most of the investigations that go into 9/11 are based on. Scientific fact. Not just superstition and the whole 'who stands to benefit' stuff, its partially based on that, but more towards the actual scientific evidence that backs us up.

They took the piss with the documentary basically, trying to portray that the free thinkers as weirdo's and on the margins of society. It didn't give a good image at all, which was their intention obviously.
Overall it started out good, but when it ended i thought it was a load of crap, it only scraped the surface of the argument, then came out looking like it had solved the whole problem . 5/10

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

SacKings384, on 2/20/2007 10:48:04 AM
Total Posts: 91, Joined: 11/24/2006

My god people just give it up already... Go back to tracking Elvis...

| Comment Score: Trash | Edit Comment

Link486, on 2/20/2007 11:34:31 AM
Total Posts: 140, Joined: 12/24/2005

Fuck i missed it, i was watching epic movie which was really shit n borin ! dont wast ur money on it !

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

bism16, on 2/20/2007 12:10:58 PM
Total Posts: 182, Joined: 11/13/2005

i know, the show was a joke! a half hearted, patronising narrated piece of shit!

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Leader_Of_The_Free_World, on 2/20/2007 6:33:07 PM
Total Posts: 136, Joined: 11/17/2005

Yeah it was really weak. Alot of stuff glossed over with an all encompassing remark made in the usual tone of "oh they're all nutjobs". It was obvious to anyone with a mind, when the interjections of emotional bias where exerted, the creators lacked any real scientific knowledge. They basically hid behind the usual propoganda tricks, rather than analytical disscussion.

I was very glad they only managed to disprove a few minor issues. The original assertion that there are over 50 different theories, shows how complex and as yet inadequately investigated the whole issue is.

All-in-all I'm pretty pleased that the BEEB was the first broadcaster to produce a serious documentary, even if it didn't quite manage to be rational throughout. Of course there is enough material for a whole series, at least, but I doubt the public is ready for that yet.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Comments per page: 10