Ron Paul Left Out of LA Times/Bloomberg Poll

71

Shouts

1

Bashes

Ron Paul Left Out of LA Times/Bloomberg Poll

Posted by EternalNite Promoted 748 days 5 hours ago 1136 views

Politics / US Politics | 32 comments |

Stumble it!

The question read: .... for whom would you vote: Brownback, Gingrich, Giuliani, Hucakabee, Hunter, McCain, Romney, Tancredo, Tommy Thompson or Fred Thompson? Anyone else notice a name (or two) missing from that list? Yeah, me too.

« View full article »

My Shout Count

Comments

These comments in RSS.

Comment View Threshold:

fuzz123, on 6/13/2007 12:02:22 PM
Total Posts: 441, Joined: 9/9/2006

One needs look no further than the current list of GOP "front runners" to realize that this country is completely fucked, and is full of imbeciles.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

EternalNite, on 6/13/2007 12:39:54 PM
Total Posts: 8, Joined: 2/18/2007

Or you could look at the Democratic "front runners". Freakin Socialists!

| Comment Score: Lame | Edit Comment

fuzz123, on 6/13/2007 12:46:19 PM
Total Posts: 448, Joined: 9/9/2006

Yep. It's back to the big decision:

Giant douche, or turd sandwich.

| Comment Score: Useful | Edit Comment

SRH-MayheM, on 6/13/2007 12:55:02 PM
Total Posts: 589, Joined: 12/15/2006

^ haha south park is the shit.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

AsiaRulez, on 6/14/2007 3:24:34 PM
Total Posts: 1932, Joined: 11/13/2005

Ron Paul better not go JFK. He is competing with psychopaths like Giuliani, its damn scary but the guy has courage.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

treitus, on 6/16/2007 12:19:10 PM
Total Posts: 24, Joined: 5/30/2006

I'm glad there is at least one person trying to stir shit up and be himself. While the other runners are trying to get the christian vote, or get the pro-life vote, Ron seems to be trying to get the unified vote.

But I agree AsiaRulez, he may be pissing off too many too fast.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Trooper111k, on 6/16/2007 2:16:24 PM
Total Posts: 52, Joined: 3/28/2007

^''Or you could look at the Democratic "front runners". Freakin Socialists!''

I'd like you to give me your definition of a socialist, because it looks quite wrong

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

NutManIV, on 6/16/2007 4:27:50 PM
Total Posts: 1351, Joined: 10/18/2006

Why even bother putting someone in a poll when they have a 0% chance of being nominated?

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Distracted, on 6/16/2007 5:08:19 PM
Total Posts: 168, Joined: 11/29/2006

@NutmanIV

so then why did they put Huckabee and Brownback and all of the other guys who don't stand a chance. With your logic Guiliani, Romney, and McCain should have been the only ones mentioned.

Did you even read the article? The logic doesn't follow through and that's the only thing the author was pissed off about.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

NutManIV, on 6/16/2007 5:18:54 PM
Total Posts: 1357, Joined: 10/18/2006

Because there's a SLIGHT chance that Huckabee and Brownback could be nominated or gain some support within key figures of the GOP. Ron paul stands against almost everything the Republicans are for. He has no chance whatsoever.

Btw, did anyone stop to think that maybe this was just a simple mistake and not some huge conspiracy against ron paul? No of course not...Shoutwire is the official Guardian angel of ron paul.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Comments per page: 10